ABSTRACT Over the past 50 years since the first research in the field of urban development IMPLEMENTATION plans, there has been a noticeable absence of a comprehensive literature review on this topic in the global arena. This article provides a textual analysis related to the subject of urban development IMPLEMENTATION plans, to identify important and recurring themes alongside analyzing the relationships between authors, journals, and countries in this field. Along with the bibliographic analysis, documents related to the field of urban development IMPLEMENTATION plans were reviewed to identify influential indicators in their IMPLEMENTATION. To this end, 456 scientific articles were extracted from the Scopus scientific database as of October 28th, 2022, and analyzed using scientometric software. These analyses include examining author keywords, country co-authorships, journal bibliographic coupling, and author co-citations. In this study, 74 final indicators were identified as the most recurrent indicators in this field. The bibliographic analysis also produced several noteworthy results. The United States is the most active country in this field, with a link strength of 40 and 176 articles. Berke, P. is the most influential author in this field, with a link strength of 1623 and 99 citations. Among the journals examined, "Land Use Policy" has the highest bibliographic coupling strength of 84, and the "Journal of the American Planning Association" has the highest number of documents related to this field, with 22 documents; finally, among the identified. Extended Abstract Introduction The IMPLEMENTATION of urban development projects has been a neglected topic in public policy research, despite its critical importance in ensuring the success of such projects. While there have been numerous studies on the factors that contribute to the success or failure of policy IMPLEMENTATION, there has been a lack of systematic reviews on the subject of IMPLEMENTATION as a whole. This study aims to address this gap in knowledge by providing a comprehensive overview of the IMPLEMENTATION process of urban development projects. This study aims to address this gap in knowledge by providing a comprehensive overview of the IMPLEMENTATION process of urban development projects. The study begins by collecting and categorizing existing research in the field, focusing on three main questions: -What are the key indicators for successful IMPLEMENTATION? -What are urban journals and articles' current trends and performance? -How do countries and researchers collaborate in this area? The study also examines the relationships between authors, publishers, and different types of documents through bibliographic analysis. Ultimately, this study highlights the need for further research and a more structured approach to understanding the IMPLEMENTATION process of urban development projects.   Methodology This study examined the literature related to IMPLEMENTATION and evaluation plans in urban and land use planning. The authors used the Scopus database to extract and collect data, focusing on combining the keywords "IMPLEMENTATION-plan" and "evaluation-plan" in the keywords, abstracts, and titles. Initially, 621 studies were extracted, but 456 articles were selected as the final database after filtering out non-article documents. The authors observed a general upward trend for studies from 1968 to 2022, with a significant increase in the slope of the trend from 2007. However, a slight decrease in studies was observed in 2021 and 2022, possibly due to the global pandemic and the emergence of new related topics. The authors used a four-stage process to analyze the bibliographic subject of the study, including simultaneous occurrence analysis, co-authorship analysis, bibliographic coupling analysis, co-citation analysis, content analysis, and thematic analysis. The authors identified the selected articles' research objectives, methodologies, findings, and main themes and sub-themes. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature on IMPLEMENTATION and evaluation plans in urban and land use planning.   Results and discussion This research aims to comprehensively analyze the IMPLEMENTATION and execution of urban development plans using bibliometrics and systematic analysis. The study considers evaluation as a crucial part of the IMPLEMENTATION process and seeks to answer three fundamental questions. Firstly, it identifies effective indicators of IMPLEMENTATION and execution globally. Secondly, it examines the trends and performances of new articles and urban journals. Thirdly, it investigates the pattern of cooperation among countries and researchers. The study identifies 74 general indicators that significantly impact the IMPLEMENTATION process of urban plans. The results show that "performance evaluation," "effectiveness," "land use," "zonation," "participation," "PROGRAM quality," and "IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM" are critical indicators in this area. The study also highlights the importance of evaluation in the discussion of PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION and its separability from the IMPLEMENTATION process. Using the scientometric software VOSviewer, the study analyzed 68 keywords related to the bibliographic topic. "PROGRAM evaluation" obtained the first place, followed by "PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION" and "PROGRAM quality." The co-authorship analysis based on author items revealed that Berke, P. has the highest number of citations and link strength. Additionally, the study found that 72 countries have research in this field, with 22 countries having at least 5 citations that were clustered into 5 clusters by the software. The "land use policy" journal had the highest link strength, and the "Journal of the American planning association" had the highest number of documents related to this field. In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights for policymakers and researchers interested in urban development planning. It comprehensively examines the IMPLEMENTATION and execution of urban development plans, identifies effective indicators, and investigates the pattern of cooperation among countries and researchers. The study highlights the importance of evaluation in the IMPLEMENTATION process and its separability from the IMPLEMENTATION process.   Conclusion The main goal of this research was to fill the gap in research on the IMPLEMENTATION and execution of urban development projects in the field, as no systematic review of the topic has been conducted from a global perspective since the first research in this field about half a century ago. Only in some studies, such as those by Talen (1996), Oliveira & Pinho (2010), Rudolf & Grădinaru (2017), has the evaluation of IMPLEMENTATION been systematically reviewed, or the systematic review of experiences in a specific urban area, such as the review of various experiences in the Beijing urban area (Chu, 2020). In this research, with the comprehensive approach that the evaluation of IMPLEMENTATION is an integral part of the overall process of implementing and executing urban development projects, this process has been examined from the perspective of bibliometrics and systematic analysis of this field. The main difference of this research, which makes it completely new, is firstly having a comprehensive approach to the IMPLEMENTATION field, where PROGRAM evaluation is only an important part of its structure, and secondly, using the scientometric software VOSviewer for the first time in this field. In essence, the conclusive outcomes of this investigation were entirely novel and exhibited some partial congruences with antecedent studies in the domain of appraising and discerning indicators. Significantly, this research has conferred a systematic appraisal of the literature concerning the urban IMPLEMENTATION and execution of projects, which is an unprecedented contribution. It should be acknowledged that this is an initial survey of data intended to offer a comprehensive outlook on this scholarly field, and thus it is subject to certain limitations, such as its confinement to the Scopus database. As such, it is recommended that future research endeavors encompass an analysis of additional databases and undertake comparative evaluations of the results. Funding There is no funding support.   Authors’ Contribution Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none. Conflict of Interest Authors declared no conflict of interest.   Acknowledgments  We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Background: Indicators such as access and benefit from the comprehensive and basic health services package are improved by primary health care development and using family medicine PROGRAM and referral chain as an effective strategy. Due to the gap between the rules and policies of the family medicine PROGRAM and its IMPLEMENTATION, this study aims to identify the requirements and strategies for the IMPLEMENTATION of the PROGRAM in Iran. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in 1400. Participants in the study were policy makers and managers of the Ministry of Health and insurance organizations and faculty members of medical universities. Data were collected based on the interview guide during 10 sessions of focused group discussion and analyzed by using content analysis method. Result: The implementing requirements for family medicine PROGRAM were classified into 6 titles (political, culturalsocial, economic, educational, managerial and executive) and 27 sub-titles. The required strategies were extracted in 3 titles (management of health care networks in the city and province, IMPLEMENTATION of health PROGRAMs and training of family physicians, managers and the community) and 28 sub-titles. Conclusion: The results of the study show that executive strategies in PROGRAM management, monitoring and evaluation should be considered by creating appropriate determination and will. And appropriate executive solutions could be using the capacity of the non-governmental sector in the structure of health care networks, intra-sectoral and inter-sectoral collaborations.

Among the rules that jurisprudential scholars, jurisprudence, jurists, and scholars of rhetoric have investigated are their lexical roots and customary meanings and cited their opinions in this regard as a reason or preference. Rule: "Foundation Precedes Emphasis" is the one that in the interpretation prefers the new meaning to the repetition and emphasis on the old meaning in explaining the words, and considers the new effect and independent benefit of words better than emphasizing the previous meaning. The current research is descriptive and analytical in order to express the importance, position, capacity and how to use the aforementioned rule in different sciences and examples its comparative use has been shown in the interpretation of the Qur'an, principles of jurisprudence, law and vocabulary. In other words, the necessity of paying attention to the principles of jurisprudence stems from the fact that they are basic principles, a mechanism that helps in achieving the outcome of the work of the mujtahid and his aim in ijtihad what he strives for. The study leads to results, including this rule which is one of the branches of “the IMPLEMENTATION of speech takes precedence over its neglect,” and that it aims to preserve speech from being abolished. It does not deal with the cases, in which, it is necessary to confirm or establish because of evidence where there is no justification for opposition or recommendation.

Internship is one of the most effective PROGRAMs in human development. This PROGRAM, which is an industrial research project based internship, has proved to be very effective in human resources development and university–industry relations, while many industrial problems were solved with minimal expenses. Khorasan Regional Electricity Company and Ferdowsi University of Mashhad started the internship PROGRAM since 1382 (2004) with 25 projects in the first year and have completed 165 projects in 6 years. 72 university faculty members cooperated with the PROGRAM and supervised the projects. 354 students found the opportunity to take part in the PROGRAM as interns and to experience the industrial research and team work. 162 experts and managers from the industry cooperated with project teams and benefited from the experience of academic team work. Improved relation and confidence of industry and university management in research cooperation, increased interest of industry in defining new problems and outsourcing these projects to university, and enhanced cooperation between industry engineers and students and faculty members are some results of the internship PROGRAM.

Background and Objectives: Exposure limit of employees with ergonomic risk factors should be managed based on domestic and international laws and regulations. Manual tasks are tasks due to which a person is required to use part of the body to lift, lower, push, pull, carry and hold the material. The purpose of this study was to introduce ergonomics with the IMPLEMENTATION of the PErforM Participatory ergonomics PROGRAM. Methods: The present study was carried out on all employees working in the Reactor Charging Unit of a resin company during the year 2017. The participatory ergonomics for manual tasks (PErforM) Method was used to manage ergonomic risks due to manual tasks. After holding several training sessions, ergonomic risks have been identified and evaluated using the ManTRA (Manual Tasks Risk Assessment) tool and also by staff. Then interventions suggested by the staff using the DotMocracy tool were eventually implemented. Also, the proposed interventions were simulated before IMPLEMENTATION, in order to assess interventions’ IMPLEMENTATION. Results: The tasks of pushing pallets containing 800 kg bags and machines with 25 kg bags were identified as risky manual tasks using ManTRA. After the interventions using participatory ergonomics, the intensity of repetitive tasks and force in the areas of the hands, shoulders and lower back were reduced. Conclusion: Generally, the PErforM has a high capacity to modify employee’ s exposure to ergonomic risk factors, as well as to discover effective, simple, and effective control strategies. However, achieving this goal requires the promotion of ergonomic knowledge and management commitment.

Introduction: One of the active methods of teaching is peer education. Considering that one of the expected abilities of master's degree students in health education is teaching, this study was conducted with the aim of designing, implementing, and evaluating a virtual peer education PROGRAM for students. Materials & Methods: This study was carried out in 2021-2022 in two academic years at the Faculty of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, for master's students in education and health promotion in the course "Educational Technologies" based on the ADDIE educational design model. The steps of this model include analysis, design, development, IMPLEMENTATION, and evaluation, all of which were done by the student under the supervision of the teacher. Eight virtual contents were provided by students as peer education for other students. Each content was between 30 and 45 minutes, which was compiled based on the lesson plan and educational goals. In this process, input, process, and outcome were evaluated. Four levels of Kirkpatrick's model were used to evaluate the outcome. Results: Eight students participated in this study. In the first level of Kirkpatrick (students' reaction), the average score was 18.17 ± 0.54. In the second level of learning, the average pre-test score was 12.5 ± 3.5 and the average final exam score was 17.95 ± 1.02. In the third level or skills, the average score for how to conduct needs assessment was 18.5 ± 0.73, from the educational design, was 18.8 ± 0.51, from the of preparation and IMPLEMENTATION of educational content and virtual teaching was 17.75 ± 0.92 and in the fourth level of Kirkpatrick, the average skills score in virtual education to people were 18.25 ± 1.50. Conclusion: Virtual peer education is an effective way to improve the knowledge and skills of and in the digital age, it can be used alongside face-to-face training. This study helped to improve the virtual teaching skills in students of health education and promotion.

Background: PROGRAMs that focus on positive parenting have been shown to improve parental attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors, and increase parent and child bonding. These PROGRAMs are typically conducted in a closed group format. However, when individual or community needs are more immediate, PROGRAMmers sometimes opt for an open group format. To determine the effectiveness of this adaptation to an open group format, the present study compared both groups on parental outcomes.Methods: Both closed and open group formats were offered and implemented between January 2009 and December 2012. Participants for both formats were recruited through similar means and the format placement for each family was determined by the immediacy of the need for an intervention, the time lapse until a new cycle would begin, and scheduling flexibility. Chi Square analyses were conducted to determine demographic differences between the two groups and gain scores were calculated from the pre and post-test AAPI-2 scales within a mixed MANOVA to determine group format effectiveness.Results: Though open groups contained higher risk families; parental out-come improvements were significant for both groups. All participants, regardless of group membership, demonstrated the same statistically significant improvements following completion of the PROGRAM.Conclusion: Findings provide support for adapting group formats when necessary to fit community and individual needs.

Objective (s): The aim of this project was to offer a culturally adapted model for implementing a health PROGRAMs.Methods: First evidence collected from the literature. Then expert opinions were thought. Then data were synthesized to adapt a culturally tailored model for implementing a health PROGRAM.Results: The analysis indicated that health service delivery systems should be evidence-based. On the other hand health care quality requires appropriate IMPLEMENTATION method. Prioritizing, feasibility and the different outcomes must be defined in implementing plan. Also for wide spread of a new PROGRAM, considering health policies, stakeholders roles, and existing resources should be considered.Conclusion: The findings suggest a six-step model for IMPLEMENTATION of a health PROGRAMs.